Reports that turn data into action
A Pro/Ref report is not a pile of numbers. Results can be interpreted not just as scores, but through strengths, development themes, perception gaps across stakeholder groups, and changes over cycles. The AI-powered approach turns results into development priorities and person-level training guidance.
A report consists of four layers
Heatmap
Category × evaluator group; color intensity conveys the score.
Radar
Overlays self-assessment with the outside view.
Perception gap
The difference between how a person sees themselves and how they are seen from outside.
AI & AI Tutor
AI-powered recommendations and person-level development steps.
Teacher 360 evaluation report
Örnek School · Ataşehir Campus · 2025–2026 Fall term · 38 evaluators
Category heatmap
Radar: self-assessment vs. outside view
Biggest perception gap: Communication
Parents and peers see communication at 84 while self-assessment is 72. The outside perception is higher than the person's own perception — this is a source of trust.
Shared development area: Feedback
Both the outside view (60) and self-assessment (58) are low in this category. A clear, mutually agreed priority.
Highlights and development areas
Strengths
- Collaboration 86
- Communication 80
- Professionalism 80
Development areas
- Feedback 60
- Leadership 74
- Openness to development 80
AI-powered development steps — Feedback
Training content and guiding recommendations suited to the feedback area are provided automatically.
Establish a common language with examples of good and improvable behavior.
Re-evaluate the same category next term and see the impact.
What can you see in reporting?
The right report doesn't just show what happened; it also makes clear what to do next
The reporting output is the starting point of the AI Tutor process. The system highlights the person's development areas and helps plan training, support and follow-up steps suited to those areas.